A Sick Movie
From the man that brought you Bowling for Columbine (about gun control) and the ever, highly controversial Fahrenheit 9/11 (on the Iraq war); we now have Sicko, Michael Moore’s latest documentary. This time Moore focuses in on the American healthcare system.
I went in expecting to see a lot on botched surgeries, infections caused in the hospital and other health service shortcomings; but the film stayed focused on healthcare coverage and access for American’s. Actually, Moore makes the point that the movie is not really even about the 45 million who don’t have coverage (though in fact it is about them too); but about the other 250 million and the lack of treatment they receive as well as the cost of treatment even with health insurance.
The movie starts by taking a look at different case of people who had to make harsh choices because of lack of health coverage, or because despite of their coverage they couldn’t afford care that they needed. For instance, an elderly couple is profiled that worked all their lives, owned a home, raised 3 kids, I think it was; and ended up having to move into the bedroom of their adult daughter because chronic health problems left them broke in a matter of a couple-a-three-years, though they had health insurance. They couldn’t even get the modest size room to themselves, the computer desk and computer had to stay in there.
Another example was a man who cut off the tips of his middle and ring fingers in a sawing accident. The hospital gave him the choice of getting the middle finger tip reattached for 60,000 or the ring finger tip reattached for 12,000. He didn’t have health insurance, so he took the cheaper of the too, and now is left with an undersized appendage.
The movie transitions to a single mother who feigns common law marriage in Canada with a friend who lives just over the boarder so that she can take advantage of the free healthcare in Canada.
If you’re like me you’ve been regaled with the stories of massive weight times in Canadian hospitals, and with stories of how Canadians rather come here to the U.S. for service. Moore’s film shows sparsely packed wait rooms, and interviews with Canadians by enlarge satisfied with their health services.
Both in Canada and in the Europe Moore tells the foreigners the cost of American service or denial of services because of indigence to capture their reactions of surprise or dismay. In France Moore mocks those that decry the notions of long periods of time off work for recovery and universal health care by feigning, with dry humor, that he thinks he’s being lied to by commies and socialist, and that he needs to find some American’s in France who will tell him the truth. He has dinner with such a group and they compare the American system to that which services them in France.
Moore also tests a British doctor’s financial well being under a system of social medicine. It is demonstrated with the new model Audi that he drives and his million dollar home that healthcare providers need not be financially destitute under such a system; but the most poignant thing was that he received bonus for such preventive and health improvement measures as getting patients to quit smoking.
The most grabbing parts of the film were saved for the end, where 9/11 rescue workers were taken to and received treatment in Cuba that they were denied in the U.S. I’ll leave all the details for you to see in the film.
With all said and done, what do we really take away from Sicko though? Those who lean hard to the left will undoubtedly see an unyielding triumph; proving the ultimate supremacy of social-medicine and universal government paid healthcare. Those who lean hard to the right (if they dare bother to see the film) would bemoan “but OHHH, what about the taxes!” – and would wine that Moore had provided no actual solutions.
To the later first - Moore doesn’t in fact provide a specific plan in this film. But that’s fine actually. Such is to be worked out at town hall meetings, at policy boards and in the halls of Congress. I think he accomplished his goal of sparking the discussion and laying out a framework of the direction that he proposes we go I; and he does a good, and as usual, humorous job of supporting his position in large part. And despite Sanjay Gupta’s false reporting, he seemed to have all his facts lined up.
On the other hand, while making a compelling case that we in America can, with our wealth can certainly do much better in providing health care to all, that is affordable at the point of purchase; he doesn’t address a basic issue of the opposing argument. What about the taxes?
I’d like to see a treatment comparing the cost of premiums, co-pays and out of pocket expense for the average working class American, versus how much is paid in taxes by an equivalent working class Canadian or Frenchman to pay for their universal healthcare; which is free to all at the point of service.
I believe healthcare for all is a laudable goal, and at least basic care and emergency services should be provided as a human right to all citizens. But I am also concerned about how we get there. There’s too much cost built into the American system with the insurance middleman and the profit motive that could be removed from the health delivery system; but I won’t get into all that here.
All in all, Sicko is another engaging documentary from Michael Moore, with his usual touch of snark and humor. Whether or not one agrees with Moore’s final conclusions, this film serves and an important voice and perspective to be added to the discourse on revamping of healthcare in the U.S. Not as dynamic as Fahrenheit 9/11, but another solid piece of work worth the time and overpriced ticket they’re charging at theatre’s these days.
By D. Yobachi Boswell
posted in Cultural, Social Commentary, Socio-Economic | 6 Comments | EMail This Post | View blog reactions | Print This Post












