Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, who was the first female elected president of a modern African state shares the award with fellow liberian Leymah Gbowee who was an activisit in opposing the brutal rule of Sirleaf’s predecessor Charles Taylor. Finally, the other honoree is Tawakkul Karman, a mother of three, who leads the human rights group Women Journalists without Chains, and worked to confront Yemen’s authoritarian rule this year in the uprisings of the “Arab Spring”.

Here is an interview that I posted that NPR conducted with Leymah Gbowee in 2008 regarding the documentary Pray the Devil Back to Hell. She and the producer of the film talk about the “Women in White’s” work in confronting Charles Taylor’s regime.

See the more on the documentary here.

How Black Colleges Are Turning White and Keeping Their Historically Black Colleges and Universities Status: The Ethnic Cleansing Of African Americans in the Age of Obama (Part 1 of 3 )
By Jahi Issa, Ph.D.

For more than 100 years, HBCU’s have served as a model for educating a plethora of African American leadership around the country. Although the mission statements of most HBCUs do not state this fact, HBCUs grew out of the social disorder and aftermath of the American Civil War—a period which constitutionally brought millions of formerly enslaved Africans into citizenry in the United States. Similar to colleges and universities that were created for groups such as Catholics, Jews and for immigrant groups, HBCUs were created in reaction to de facto marginalization created by a European American hostile society. Because of the efforts of the Civil Right Movement, HBCU’s were finally recognized as important institutions and were given special status for Federal funding. However, over the past few decades, HBCUs have been targeted as being too “Black” and many states are progressively trying to eliminate African Americans from these institutions that have served as a buffer zone for the Black middle class. Some HBCUs have and are going through hostile takeovers in order to turn them into White education facilities and thereby permanently eliminating the African American middle class.

African American Perform Better at HBCUsAlthough over the years many have argued that HBCUs are redundant and irrelevant in today’s “post racial world,” the fact remains that these intuitions of higher learning, according to the National Science Foundation, graduate more than 33% of all African Americans earning Bachelor’s and doctoral degrees, almost double that compared to African Americans attending predominately White schools . Furthermore, according to the Washington Post, the “post racial” world that many hoped for with the election of President Barack Obama may just be an illusion. Relying on a recent report from the Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends, the Washington Post noted that the typical White household in 2009 had 20 times more wealth ($113,149) than the typical Black household ($5,677). Moreover, another report that was conducted by Brandeis University in May of 2010 and concluded that African American will never reach wealth parity with that of White Americans. Both reports note that African Americans with college degrees stand a better chance at edging out a decent life in the United States than those without degrees.

According to a 1977 study that was conducted under the leadership of Dr. Mary Francis Berry, in her capacity as the former Secretary of Education in the Carter Administration, primary reasons why HBCUs tended to be better equipped to prepare students for real world experience was because they offered:

“credible models for aspiring Blacks…
“psycho-socially congenial settings in which blacks can develop”
“insurance against a potentially declining interest in the education of black folk”

Furthermore, the report posits that the ultimate purpose of the HBCU is to “represent the formal structures which nurture and stress racial ideology, pride and worth for Blacks. Consequently, they are what every racial and ethnic group is entitled to have—a political, social and intellectual haven.” The report mentioned above was recently vindicated in a study that was published in January of 2011. Three economists concluded that African Americans who attend HBCUs tend to perform better in the work force than African Americans who attend predominately White universities and colleges.

The 1965 Higher Education Act and Title III: Federal Funding For African-Americans in Higher EducationOne cannot discuss today’s relevancy of HBCU’s without mentioning the Higher Education Act of 1965. The Higher Education Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson as part of his Great Society program that sought “to strengthen the educational resources of our colleges and universities and to provide financial assistance for students in postsecondary and higher education.” Before the law was signed by President Johnson, the Chairman of the House Committee on Education, an African-American Harlem Congressman named Adam Clayton Powell made an amendment that defined HBCUs as “…any historically black college or university that was established prior to 1964, whose principal mission was, and is, the education of black Americans.” The amendments also legalized the federal funding of HBCUs through the Higher Education Act of 1965 Title III program. Title III is the federal governing body which sets the standard for providing funding for HBCUs. Over the years Title III had provided billions of dollars to support African-American undergraduate, graduate programs, increasing African American participation in math and science, real estate acquisitions and strengthen HBCU’ endowments to name a few. In all, Title III has helped African American universities to not only increase their numbers in accredited degree programs across the country; it has also allowed many HBCUs to have a tremendous economic impact in the communities that they serve.

Economic Impact of HBCUs and the Origins of a New Era Rifted in CorruptionIn 2005 the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), an office within the U.S. Department of Education, published a report that documented the economic impact of HBCUs. Primarily, this study was introduced by President George W. Bush and continued by President Barack Obama administration which sought to include the participation of private sector (corporations) into the governing bodies of HBCUs. The study found that more than 100 HBCUs had in 2001 an economic impact of almost 11 billion dollars in the communities that they served. For instance, schools such as Howard University total economic impact in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area was more than 600 million dollars. For smaller schools such as Delaware State University, their total economic impact was more than 150 million dollars. It must be noted that the economic impacts also made a national impression. Again, according to the National Science Foundation, HBCUs bestowed nearly 25% of all bachelor degrees earned by African Americans in 2001. In the areas of agriculture, biology, mathematics and the physical sciences, HBCUs accounted for more than 40 percent of all bachelor degrees earned by African-Americans. With this stated, it is easy to see why corporations would want a piece of the pie. Furthermore, if one is to evaluate the current lack of transparency on Wall Street, it is easy to see that Wall Street’s collaboration with today’s HBCUs could represent the end of African American higher education as we know it.

The Second Corporate takeover Black Higher EducationAlthough President Barack Obama HBCU Executive Order 13532 “encourages private investment in HBCUs,” however, research proves that corporate partnerships is not new to HBCUs, nor are their historic input solely motivated by financial gains. Not long after the end of reconstruction, Northern White capitalists sought extreme ways in which they could control the ebb and flow of African American education. This was done to curtail the rapid development of African American educational institutions immediately after the Civil War. For instance, from 1865-1880 federal agents documented that there were thousands of African American schools operating throughout the South independent of White control. When northern White benevolent groups finally reach the South with mythical-preconceived notions that they were coming to “civilize” former wretched enslaved Africans, they were astonished to see that Africans Americans had already had established their own schools systems fully equipped with African American teachers. These schools’ full missions were self-determination and political control over the regions of the South in which they were the majority.

The high level of African American political education created a problem for the nation after the Compromise of 1877. Since African Americans were no longer allowed to exercise political autonomy in the South, strategies were devised on the federal level to control the nature of their education. The federal government along with the corporate conglomerates in the North believed that the only way that they could ensure the continual flow of cheap labor in the South was to train African Americans in a way that they would not advocate for political control of their communities. Furthermore, there was another important issue at play—that was African American competition with Whites for high skilled jobs. The solution was a new type of training for Southern African Americans was called industrial education. This type of schooling served the purpose of supervising and training African American to be subservient to White interest. Schools such as Hampton, Tuskegee and Delaware State were devised as the alternative to the African American independent schools that advocated self-determination after the Civil War. The corporate-handpicked spokesman for this new type of schooling was none other than Booker T. Washington. One must remember that Washington’s entrance exam into Hampton University was sweeping the floor. The ultimate goal of Hampton was to control the emerging Black leadership of the Jim Crow South, and train African Americans in the corporate labor needs of the new South. The financial backing of Hampton University and what would later be Tuskegee was provided by White Northern corporations and philanthropy. This corporate-industrial style form of education continued to dominate Southern higher educational institutions long after the death of Booker T. Washington in 1915.

The White House Initiative on HBCUs Encourages Corporate Collaboration?
The current encroachment of private corporate input into the affairs of African American higher education could and will be disastrous. It would mean that African Americans will be forced back into the Jim Crow Era. A deliberate attempt to curtail educational advancements that was gained by the Civil Rights and Black Power era seems to be the main motivation. The White House Advisor on HBCUs, John Wilson, Jr., stated in April of 2010 HBCUs “must not be seen as plaintiffs in the struggle for civil rights….” Dr. Wilson, a graduate of Morehouse College, tends to forget that it was struggle for Civil Rights that literally allows him to serve President Barack Obama. The White House Initiative on HBCUs came into existence because of the “plaintiff” of the past. Furthermore, Mr. Wilson’s statement implies that African American should abandon their pursuit for full rights and self-interest. Taking a lead from Dr. Wilson’s statements, A Wall Street Journal editor named Jason L. Liley wrote an editorial stating that HBCU’s were a dismal failure and that “Mr. Obama ought to use the federal government’s leverage” to bring these schools under Wall Street’s control. He went further by stating that HBCUs should all become private and model themselves after the University of Phoenix. One month after Liley’s editorial, a conservative from the Wall Street funded American Enterprise Institute also imputed on Wall Street’s quest to control Black education. He ended his article in the Chronicle of Higher Education by stating that HBCUs “should accordingly be encouraged to enroll more non-black students.” The author mentioned nothing about White universities increasing African American enrollment. He also stated that “some HBCUs, notably two in West Virginia (Bluefield State and West Virginia State University), are in fact no longer predominantly black” but are still receiving special (HBCU) federal funding. Five months after the Chronicle of Higher Education essay appeared, the White House Advisor on HBCUs, John Wilson, Jr. was invited as the keynote speaker to the Thurgood Marshall College Fund. The title of his speech “Historically Black Colleges and Universities and the Albatross of Undignified Publicity” conveyed that HBCU are historically cursed when it comes to publicity in White dominated media outlets. Moreover, the central thesis of his speech, although impressively constructed, was that HBCUs should jump on the corporate bandwagon by accepting funds from good corporate Samaritans such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffett.

Black Colleges Turning White or White Cultural Hegemony: The Signs of the Future Although the Higher Education Act of 1965 clearly states that an HBCU is a school “whose principal mission was, and is, the education of black Americans,” economist and scholar at American Enterprise Institute, Richard Vedder, reminds us that there is a trend being shaped were as HBCUs who formally had an African American majority student and faculty body, and now have White majority populations, still receive federal funding geared for African Americans. These two schools are Bluefield State College and West Virginia State University. According to a May 19, 2000 CNN report, White enrollment at HBCUs is on the rise. Other schools such as Kentucky State University, Elizabeth City State University and Delaware State University are only a few schools that have a growing White and non-African American student and faculty population. Furthermore, according to an August 17, 2011 Wall Street Journal article called “Recruiters at Black Colleges Break From Tradition,” HBCUs such as Tennessee State University, Delaware State University and Paul Quinn College are cited as no longer focusing exclusively on recruiting African Americans. The author of the article points out that Tennessee State University’s Black enrollment has reduced to around 70 %, while Paul Quinn College Black enrollment has been predicted to fall from 94% to 85% for the Fall 2011 academic year.

Many have asked the question if White enrollment at HBCUs represent a decrease in African American enrollment at the same schools. The year that CNN published its story, Bluefield College African American faculty had dwindled to less than one percent from previous decades. The African American student enrollment had also decreased to less than ten percent. Nonetheless, research shows that when African American faculty at HBCUs is a majority, African American students tend to enroll at a higher percentage and they tend to be more productive in the work place once they graduate. There seems to be a direct correlation between African American student enrollment and that of its faculty. In other words, if the African American faculty enrollment at HBCU’s is low, African American students tend not to attend HBCU’s. When this occurs, is an HBCU still a HBCU? In other words, can you have a HBCU without Black students and faculty? This is exactly the issue that American Enterprise Institute scholar Richard Vedder was raising in his essay in the Chronicle of Higher Learning. Why are HBCUs that are no longer Black in students or faculty population receiving federal monies geared toward African Americans? The federal government seems to believe that this trend represents the future for HBCUs.

Jahi Issa, Ph.D Assistant Professor of History and Africana Studies at Delaware State University and Former Northeastern North Carolina Grass Root Coordinator for President Barack Obama’s 2008 Presidential Campaign.

The festival is a celebration of African cultural awareness providing authentic African wears, drumbs, and more; as well as music, crafts and other cutlural arts spring from an African lineage. There is a mainstage with various performance arts as well as historical information provided throughout the festival.
Vendors come from across the United States and foriegn countries to sell art work, crafts, African clothing, various services, and of course that which would make any festival incomplete without, food. Both traditional festival foods that you might find at any fair or outdoor even in the Southeast, aswell as Caribean and other foods were in abundance for fairgoers culinary pleasure.

Yet, while many where there to conduct business, the financial force that makes
having the festival possible and keeps entry free, the African Street Fest also had on hand a number of organizations with a social message or social services to provide or recruite the community to.

One such Organization was the STCC, Save TSU Community Coalition. This group of Tennessee State students, alumni and falculty are looking to recruit members to their cause, which is as they see to preserve the academic quality and cultural identiy of thier unviersity, for which they say is underattack by out side business and political interest. With signs stating “Save TSU, Stop TBR Now” they recruitted members of the TSU family to attend their “”Teach-in” and get involved in what’s happening at the school at the park that sits on the front porch of the TSU campus. TBR is the Tennessee Board of Regents which oversees the 6 state universities and community colleges not in the UT or University of Tennessee system.
STCC member and TSU alumn Kenneth Caine said their purpose in reaching out to people at the festival is to “try to preserve our institutions of learning, to ensure that we have adequate access to the middle class through education and beyond.” STCC believes that radical and delitarious changes are being made in the university’s curriculium without “Shared Governance” with stake holders, and without feasibility studies and due process to justify cuts and reorganization of academic programs.

STCC’s next Teach-in will be on Thursday September 29, at Corinthian Baptist Church on 28th Ave from 6:00 to 8:00 pm. Kenneth Caine can be reached on behalf of STCC at riverprint@bellsout.net
Another non-profit group on hand was Reconciliation Inc., which advocates on behalf of the families of the incarcerated. Reconciliation Director, Dr. Ann Charvat spoke to me at length about the organizations vision and purpose. “We serve the families of the incarcerated…and essentially we stand in opposition to the institution of slavery as represented by the prison system, an institution enslaving blacks and whites,” she stated. Dr. Charvat went on to say “We try to help the family members of the people in prison, and when they come out we help that family try to bond and stay together…if you’re priviledged, or your lucky, or you have a lot of money, your alcholism or drug addiction takes you to treatment. And for the rest of us it takes us to prison. We have a belief that 85% of all people that are involved are in the justice system are suffering from untreated alcohol and drug addiction.”

Their programs include family dinners, providing a family guest house to family members of those on death row at the Riverbend State prison here in Nashville, providing education and more. You can receive a copy of their Handbook for Families and Friends of Tennessee Prisioners, or support the organization by contacting them at (615) 292-6371.

If by itself it’s not clear that this is completely ideological partisan politics, the following facts make it clear:

From Political Correction

FLASHBACK: Rep. Cantor Did Not Mention Offsetting Cuts In 2004 Requests For Disaster ReliefAugust 29, 2011 5:28 pm ET

In 2011, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) has consistently opposed federal disaster relief without offsetting budget cuts. However, Cantor didn’t always prioritize fiscal “discipline” over helping his constituents recover from disasters. After Tropical Storm Gaston hit the Richmond, VA area in 2004, Cantor appealed to President Bush and DHS Director Tom Ridge for disaster assistance and took credit for securing federal funds when they became available.

Further, Cantor specifically voted against offsetting disaster rellief with budget cuts. NBC’s First Read recites this about Cantor’s flip-flopping ways in a piece called Cantor against offsetting disaster funds before he was for it:

Now, Sam Stein at Huffington Post points out that, in 2004, Cantor actually voted against a bill that would have done exactly what he’s now calling for:

“[A] bemused Democratic source notes that in October 2004, Cantor voted against an amendment to an emergency supplemental bill for disaster aid that would have “fully offset” the cost of that supplemental with “a proportional reduction of FY05 discretionary funding” elsewhere.

It is beyond clear that Cantor has no principle in this regard, as the whole Tea-party-esq game is principle-less. This has all to do with attacking who’s president. The Republicans running both Congress and the Presidency sepent money like drunken sailorson shore leave for years, running up our debt and ultimately collapsing the economy; then all of a sudden when Democrats gain power and in particular a Black man that they paint as a muslim terrorist becomes president, they fight tooth and nail to paint any and every initative as a raiding of the American bank account. This is nothing more than partisan political tactics.

This totals 15 videos that I found on youtube of whites looting and rioting, and only one comes from a news organization. It’s clear that the majority race run news media in both Britian and America intentionally hid the white rioting.

Actually at the time white roiting was increasing mid-week last week, in America they the mainstream news stopped covering the issue all together.

These are the racist propaganda games continuously played.

Hooded White kids roit and loot in Clapham

White woman looting in Clapham is getting her “taxes back”

Massive White Roiting at Clapham Junction - whites carrying as much as their arms can hold. Then the white rioters rob each other of their ill gotten loot.

At 1:36 White guy admits he came from Eastalnd to riot in Hackney - note the mask pulled down around his neck

Mostly whites looting a store in Lodon

A little racial unity: whites and blacks looting together

White rioters attempt to ambush police

Watch the white kid walking off with a big flat screen at 2:04, then followed by a white woman with a smaller flat screen and other objects. Then another white man with a big screen at 3:01, following by mostly whites scurring as it appears the police are coming.

All the while you hear windows smashing in the background.

This doesn’t make the western, white population dominated news. Nope.

It’s funny, yet not surprizing how we don’t see all the whites rioting and looting, just Blacks and other minorities.

I remember when people were starving and drowing in New Orleans and their was one picture of black man wading through waist deep water with food and supplies with a caption calling him a looter, and then another of a white couple with supplies they’d taken saying “residence…finding bread and water from a local store”

Pure media & broader culture racism.

Those two photos can be seen here

White rioters in wealthy knottingham take joy in their deeds as they play coy about it:

Whites looting in Peckham

Whites Looting in Croydon

More whites looting in Croydon

Hooded Whites bash through store glass and attack Atm machine in Croydon rioting

White woman can barely carry her loot out of Croydon store

The article states in part that:

Since the coalition came to power just over a year ago, the country has seen multiple student protests, occupations of dozens of universities, several strikes, a half-a-million-strong trade union march and now unrest on the streets of the capital (preceded by clashes with Bristol police in Stokes Croft earlier in the year). Each of these events was sparked by a different cause, yet all take place against a backdrop of brutal cuts and enforced austerity measures. The government knows very well that it is taking a gamble, and that its policies run the risk of sparking mass unrest on a scale we haven’t seen since the early 1980s. With people taking to the streets of Tottenham, Edmonton, Brixton and elsewhere over the past few nights, we could be about to see the government enter a sustained and serious losing streak.

The policies of the past year may have clarified the division between the entitled and the dispossessed in extreme terms, but the context for social unrest cuts much deeper. The fatal shooting of Mark Duggan last Thursday, where it appears, contrary to initial accounts, that only police bullets were fired, is another tragic event in a longer history of the Metropolitan police’s treatment of ordinary Londoners, especially those from black and minority ethnic backgrounds, and the singling out of specific areas and individuals for monitoring, stop and search and daily harassment.

One journalist wrote that he was surprised how many people in Tottenham knew of and were critical of the IPCC, but there should be nothing surprising about this. When you look at the figures for deaths in police custody (at least 333 since 1998 and not a single conviction of any police officer for any of them), then the IPCC and the courts are seen by many, quite reasonably, to be protecting the police rather than the people.

Watch this video of a man from Tottenham London speaking about how the unrest began, called Tottenham riots - the truth. He tells of the initial event that sparked the unrest, and gives salient analysis behind it all.

Said to be the video of the girl being attacked by police that set off the riots, which the older gentlemen refers to in the previous video:

Also this video: Protesters answers in london voilence why is this happening & their demand

https://www.paypal-donations.com/campaign_16.html

East Africa Famine Relief - Support A Cause You Care About - Donate with PayPal

You can help children and families affected by famine in East Africa. Support these nonprofits who are providing emergency food and water aid to the millions at risk, in the worst African drought in 60 years. Donate now with PayPal.. Support a cause you care about. Donate with PayPal.

For background you can read my post from a couple of weeks ago on the decleration of Famine.

And watch this PBS video from yesterday:

The World Food Program says they’ll run out of money for food in 2 to 3 weeks.

If you don’t use paypal, you could try Oxfam for your donation.

The video starts off rocky; but give it a few seconds: