Google
 
19th March 2008

Steinem, Ferraro and Clinton: Why Black Women Must Not Link Too Closely With White Feminist

posted in Politics, Social Commentary, Racial Injustice | | | View blog reactions | Print This Post

Alright, we must start with some precursor information as to who the perspective of this writing is coming from. I’m a 30 year old Black Man.

Now, to the issue:

My first point in backing my thesis that follow is that it’s not my refrain; but one that I’ve learned from Black womanist over the years, namely that the White Feminist Movement as a whole disregards the struggle against racism, disregards Black women’s specific identity as “Black” women, and are caught up in and blinded by their own white skin privilege; while fighting one ism, they often re-enforce another.

Gloia Steinm and Dorthy Pitmen Hughes by Dan Wynn

These factors have been well demonstrated by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and her feminist surrogates ever since Hillary’s late 2007 “inevitability” faded away, and a Black male became an equally likely contender to Clinton.

The gender baiting got started in earnest by Gloria Steinem once Hillary Clinton lost the first nomination vote. Just preceding the New Hampshire vote she unleashed her color arousal oped to move white women to vote for the white woman over the Black. The two latest examples of diminishing race simply to uplift white womanhood are Geraldine Ferraro’s lie that Obama is simply an affirmative action case who didn’t earn his way on the campaign trail, and is “lucky” to be Black; and loud mouth Roseanne Barr extolling Obama to Bow to the White Woman

The greater factor that builds on top of these factor goes to something Malcolm X pointed out in the Ballot or the Bullet speech. He prefaced the beginning of the speech by saying that we (black folk) should leave religion at home when we come out to discuss our agenda, because if we start talking about religion we’ll just end up fighting. He goes on to say, they don’t lynch you because you’re a Baptist; they lynch you because you’re Black. They don’t lynch me because I’m a Muslim; they lynch me because I’m Black.

When America socially, economically, and judicially lynches us still today, they don’t distinguish between our genders too much; and that includes white women and white female feminist in particular.

The white feminist judge will throw a Black mother’s ass in jail faster than you can say “hear me roar”, while giving a white woman probation for the same offense. When it comes down to the nitty gritty get down; they won’t see you as a woman, they’ll still see you as a nigger.

It’s like the old joke: “what do you call a Black Doctor? A nigger”. Well, those whites who are of that mind, including many feminist, they call Black men and women nigger alike.

Carol Mosoley-Braun

It’s funny how it’s a gender loyalty litmus test for Black women to have to vote for Hillary, or you’re selling out womanhood according to many white feminist; but where was the vocalism for Carol Moseley-Braun in 2004? White feminist icons and groups gave the obligatory endorsement, and then white women proceed to vote for everybody but her. It’s funny how Moseley-Braun’s candidacy never got off the ground though women are the majority in the Democratic electorate; mostly white women. Why weren’t their loud pronouncements from white women that you must vote for Senator Moseley-Braun, and calls for Kerry to “bow to the woman”?

White feminist are quick to rant when white women ain’t being done right; but they were slow to get angry when a group predominately composed of African American women were called Nappy Head Hoes on national radio and t.v. Likewise, the white feminist world as a whole is practically silent on missing Black women and girl.

I’m not trying to speak at all to Black women’s agenda as far as fighting for gender equality, which I don’t think is my position; but I am saying that when push comes to shove white folks close ranks together, and white feminist are just that - white. They don’t forget it, and they don’t look at the Black race and say “well we have to stand with those Black people because they’re women.” In the end they take the same color-aroused perspective as white men.

This can be seen undeniably in both Gloria Steinem’s and Geraldine Ferraro’s efforts to diminish racism as a political strategic ploy to bolster a white politician.

They seem to me to only be concerned with Black women and other women of color when they want their support to bolster their own race-indifferent agenda.

Popularity: 30% [?]

Bookmark this story so others can enjoy it:

Related Posts:

There are currently 16 responses to “Steinem, Ferraro and Clinton: Why Black Women Must Not Link Too Closely With White Feminist”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On March 19th, 2008, JD said:

    I wonder how will Oparh balance her love of white women with her support of Barack. Rumor has it the white femenist backlast caused her to lower her profile. How knows but I agree with your post

  2. 2 On March 19th, 2008, D. Yobachi Boswell said:

    Again JD, white folks close ranks with each other. There are some who are willing to look at and sincerely try to understand others perspective, but not most.

    She has enough money anyway, so what difference does it really make.

  3. 3 On March 19th, 2008, Natalie said:

    The lack of inclusion of issues regarding race is what caused Alice Walker to abandon Feminism and speak instead of Womanism. Feminism didn’t listen to the needs of all females, particularly females of color. What Faminism once was is in no way shape or form what Feminism has become today. One of the main aspects of a true Feminist is someone who embraces her identity as a woman and owns it. She doesn’t allowe her mind to be controlled by popular opinion or the ideas of what a woman SHOULD do she should only be controlled by her best interests. It is the exact antithesis of Feminism to vote for someone because of theor gender or because it is what women are supposed to do. Feminism is about a woman’s right to make her own decisions and to have the respect given to her by others to know that opinion is valid. The erosion of true Feminist ideals is what makes women of my generation sometimes offended to be considered a Feminist. I guess what I am trying to say is that Clinton is no more owed the votes of women than Obama is owed the voted of African-Americans. It’s up to everyone to make up their own minds, that is what freedom is all about.

  4. 4 On March 19th, 2008, cooper said:

    I’ve always had a difficult time with feminism. The pop culture feminism I have seen though at times making good points is often just that. The constant me, me, gets under my skin, and a large majority of self labeled feminist’s totally invalidate the opinion of anyone who has a different experience than they do - as if the experience of others is somehow not germane to the issue.

  5. 5 On March 20th, 2008, MrsGrapevine said:

    I agree with Natalie and that was a point I made on another blog, I considered myself a womanist, and the other black women had no idea what that meant. They thought somehow that I was saying that I wasn’t a feminist. I couldn’t believe that young black women today didn’t know what womanist meant.

    Alice Walker definition of womanist included race, but also the dual functions that black women had to play within their race to support the whole of their race including the black man. One of the main reason race was important to Walker, is because other feminist groups ignored it or just down right discriminated against black women.

    Hillary is part of a Clinton legacy, and if she wasn’t associated with that legacy, she would have a hard time getting women to rally behind her. A lot of women don’t want to be associated with the feminist movement because they don’t understand some of the more radical elements, and I don’t think feminism is what’s working in this campaign. It’s more about timing, Bush messed the country up so much, and politics have been so divided, that people are looking for something against the norm. I believe that’s one of the reasons why Hillary didn’t run in 2004. I don’t think she would have carried as many votes from women, as she has this time around. Those extra years also provided an opportunity for the Monica Lewisnky scandal to pass, and for Hillary to shape her image and define herself apart from Bill, but in the end I think that association is driving her campaign.

  6. 6 On March 20th, 2008, D. Yobachi Boswell said:

    Natalie good explanation of the position; that added a bit of layering to what I already understood about it.

    I will say that I seen no problem with people wanting someone who’s like them in some major way (including demographically) to represent them - it’s natural and it makes sense.

    The problem is when women vote for a women, or Blacks voter for a Black, or Mormons vote for a Mormon; despite all other considerations. When you do that, you end up with people like Kwame Kilpatrick.

    So I quite well understand women being interested in the candidacy of Hillary Clinton; but it makes no more sense to vote for her because of her anatomy, than for me to vote for Obama just because he’s Black. Though he was always been at the top of my list of consideration with a couple others, I didn’t decide to go ahead and vote for him (in the primaries) until the last minute. I’m a populist like Edwards, and much of his emphasis appeals to me more.

  7. 7 On March 20th, 2008, D. Yobachi Boswell said:

    Cooper, ther seems to be a disconnect, from my outside position, between the application of it between the younger generation, and those of the brah burning era.

  8. 8 On March 20th, 2008, D. Yobachi Boswell said:

    Hmmm, well Mrs.G, I learned about womanism mostly from women in the mid 20s to very early 30s. But it might have to do with the circles I run in and the top of people I conversee with on these matters; who are who are predisposed to be more aware iof social political knowledge.

    Maybe for Hillary, just like her assumption that she would have the nomination wrapped up by super tuesday and therefore didn’t prepare a ground game in post-super tuesday states; she also took for granted that she would overwhelmingly get the female vote.

    I think a lot of these politicians are so caught up in the echo chamber of the pro-politicians and eltist that they surround themselves with that they really don’t know how real people actually feel and thinking. They may have the surface intellectual knowledge, but they don’t really understand them in their gut.

  9. 9 On March 21st, 2008, Marty said:

    Good post Yobachi. I’ve kinda sorta heard of womanism, but not really. I thought it was feminism too so I learned something new today.

    My real reason for commenting though is something I heard years ago and your post, years later, continues to confirm it. No matter what they profess or protest out loud white women will do whatever white men tell them to. Just another way of “closing ranks” amongst themselves as you observed.

  10. 10 On March 23rd, 2008, D. Yobachi Boswell said:

    Marty, I think when push comes to shove, they fall into line with their men.

  11. 11 On March 26th, 2008, S. Justice said:

    Didn’t Gloria Steinem say something against black men after the O.J. trial ? This election isn’t the first time that racism has come out of her mouth.

  12. 12 On March 26th, 2008, D. Yobachi Boswell said:

    I’m not familiar with it if she did, but the nature of her racism minimalizing article would suggest rather deep seeded racial animosity; so I’m not surprised.

  13. 13 On April 14th, 2008, Stacie said:

    Yo, you make some very good points here. I think your discussion on Carol Mosely Braun is spot-on. For the majority white feminists who support Hillary Clinton simply because she is a woman, will never admit to the fact that it’s also because she is a white woman. They deride blackfolk for playing identity politics, but the main reason they hold on so tightly to Hillary (in spite of her war vote, her poor record on social justice issues like her and her husband’s silence on Rwanda, and her dirty campaign tactics) is simply because she is a woman.

    The gulf between black women and white women in feminism is definitely very real and Rebecca Walker even suggested that it was time to consider a new ideology to describe movements related to women and justice issues. Feminism ain’t cuttin’ it anymore - at least not Ferraro’s and Steinem’s kind.

  14. 14 On April 14th, 2008, D. Yobachi Boswell said:

    Thanks for giving your input Stacie.

    Hillary’s positions have been so anti-thetical to what most democrats favor on so many issues; especially activist democrats, that her continued over whelming support even despite her racist and republican like tatics can only be attributed to a couple of things:

    1. Familiarity
    2. White women’s insistence on a white women winning (this is made clear if you listen to how she is endorsed by so many white women.)

  15. 15 On May 29th, 2008, Renee said:

    There are many different kinds of feminist theory. I am going to assume that the kind of feminism you have a problem with is radical feminism. It specifically does not examine race and in fact bases its analysis on gender, using a “representative” monolithic woman. There are many different kinds of feminism, from eco-feminism to anti-racist feminism. Feminist theory is fluid, and as such is constantly evolving. While I will agree with that the examples you point are certainly reflective of the critiques many of the other feminisms have launched at radical feminism, in and of itself it is not reason enough to totally discard it. Thanks to radical feminism we have the right to abortion, battered womens shelters, the acknowledgment of rape within a marriage etc. For all of its faults it has certainly produced results that are beneficial to ALL women.

    I don’t believe that we can afford to reject feminism, especially when one considers the various forms of feminism. Though many women may not openly admit to being feminists they never the less articulate feminist theory. You won’t find any woman that says I don’t want to be equal to a man, or find a woman that doesn’t think that equal pay for equal work is a good idea ( once again outcomes of radical feminism). Have the voices and needs of white women historically been hegemonic in feminism..certainly but that does not mean that WOC have not played an important role.

    In your bid for WOC to reject feminism in favor of race solidarity what you are ignoring is that a black man may be subject to racism in his daily life but he can still come home and beat his black life. While black men are calling for unity daily women are called bitches and ‘hos in music videos not to mention the overly sexualized portrayals as well. In the end it does WOC of color a disservice to wholly associate to closely with either black males or white females. Neither group has our best interest at heart. The black man is interested in achieving his due, by enforcing his own form of patriarchy and that is destructive to black women. While I will always fight racism when I see it, I cannot allow it to completely override the concerns I face that are totally related to gender. To do so would mean denying a significant part of who I am.

  16. 16 On May 29th, 2008, D. Yobachi Boswell said:

    Renee,

    Is not your use of the term Womanism, inherently and specifically a rejection of a certain quarter of white feminist ideology? The term exists to describe such a parsing does it not? So my call is substantially no different than the reject that you embrace by calling yourself a womanist.

    Further, my position is one I take across the board with Black folk. I don’t think Black woman need to look to white women to define empowerment for them; just as I don’t think Black people as a whole need to look to white people to define themselves -that across the board the Black paradigm has to be internally derived – self-informed.

    My ideology on this is based on, well better yet, articulated by an ideal by an African studies professor, Dr. Wosen Yefru, who uses a formula that Paradigm = epistemology + canon. If either your epistemology or canon are externally derived, then you have a false paradigm.

Leave a Reply

  • Blogroll

  • Other

    • SiteMeter